Zorn's Lemma

PAGE 1

SPECIAL CONVENTION ISSUE HARRA by Fred J ;>ckocm ProJect REAl.; New College's one am only community action program, has re cently been incorporated as a non-profit corEoration in the State of Florida. The logos behind this move stems, in part, from the stumbling blocks placed in the way of the PrOJect by the New College business office. The incidents below are indicative of the attitude ta ken by that office in regard to an impCl' tant educational experiment at NC. Mr. Harra 's antipathy toward ProJect REAL has been well documented. When Patti Barry (Marshall Barry's wife) went to Harra over Christmas to get some of the money budgeted to the ProJect, he told her that he didn't think ProJect RE AL was the type of activity NC should be sponsoring and he wasn't going tog i v e her the money. Marshall Barry went to President Elmendorf who forced Harra to !&lve up the portion of the ProJect's mo ney requested by Patti. It is not now am never was Harra's JOb to determine edu cational policy at NC. Yet he chose to use his office to harrass an education a 1 function because he disagreed with its goals and methods. The most ludicrous instance of this harrassment is the case of Mike Macey. Mike worked for ProJect REAL first tenn under the Work Study program. However when he sent in his time sheet, Harra questioned the propriety of giving Work Study money to a proJect member for ProJect work. Mr. Simcoe assured Harra that this is not only legal but desirable in that Public Law 88-452 Sec. 12 relating to Work Study Programs states in part: "The Commissioner will, to the ex tent feasible, give preference to applications which provide for emplO)'Olent of eligible students in Community Ac tion Programs. ProJect REAL is the only "Commu nity Action Program" at NC. Mike did not receive his money. Dr. Barry fimlly went to Dr. Elmendorf but could still get no action out of Harra. Harra, grasping at straws, sent a request to Dr. De me, head of Social Sciences, asking li> proval to pay Mike out of that department's funds; of course Deme refused There was never any question but that the money should come from WorkSttrl,r funds. Harra's actions, especially in. re gard to Dr. De me are simple -har rassment at best. Mike W2.5 finally paid last week. the $100, however, did not come from Wolk Study money. It was plundered from the ProJect REALbudget by Harra. This phenomenon of paying W or k Study students from the ProJect out of the ProJect's budget, is curious. 'It has happened to every student who was supposed to receive Work Study money for ProJect work including Phil Bird, Kim McCutcheon, and Kathy Turck. Harra ha; claimed that such spending was authorized by Dr. Barry; yet the only evidence he offers are statements, signed b)Barry, to the effect that so-and-so worked so many hours---a verification for theWcrk Study program. No authorization for ex penditure of ProJect funds. All these stu dents qualified for and were supposed to be on Work Study. Harra's rip-off, inthi; area comes to about $450. A foot note to this saga is the case of Sherry Litwin, who was Barry's research assistant 1 as t year. This position is normally paid for by the Division of Social Sciences. Who paid? The ProJect, of course. Thus, 'the ProJect was irpped off for another $ll8 by our own college. There is simply no excuse for these actions. Any speculation as to the cause of this behavior, and why it is tolerated by those higher up than Harra, must be un derstood in the light of Harra's antipath{ to the ProJect. Harra is not alone inthe:e feelings. Last year there was a movement among the Board of Trustees to fire Barry because the ProJectwas giving NC a bad name in Sarasota; m.aking it difficult to raise money. So 1 f Harra 's actions are confusing. consider his motives. In any event, New College mustnever allow its educational policy to be determined by the local community, or any outside community. And although to remain innovational, there must be constant self-criticism within our own community, what is not required is the pathological harrassmeot by administra tive officers of legitimate education a 1 endeavors. GOD BLUE YOU Notice To AllWork Grant Students: From: COD If you haven't returned blue forms, do !Q If you don't, it will be assumed that you no longer need a work grant (even for next year!?) If anyone would like to talk to Go:i office hours (bureaucracy will triumph!) are Wed. and Thurs. 1-3:30. PROJECT REAl CHARGE by Chris Van Dyk "I feel that they have not wanted to understand my position. I am responsible to see that proper stewardship of funds ex ists. "I have to be able to assure the Presi dent and the Trustees that I have sufficient information regarding expenditure of money should the Internal Revenue Serv ice, prev1ous contnbutors, or a trustee want to know why and by whom any money is spent. I have fllowed financi a 1 procedures that would protect the institu tion. "I do not nfake judgements as to whe ther or not money should be spent, but I must ascertain that the expenditure is au thorized--that receipts for reimbursemens are available where appropriate." Mr. Harra must be able to show IRS who a check is paid to and why: for what goods, for what services. ProJect REALhas been delinquent in accountng its expenditures; that is, if Harra is a "stumbling block" in the way of obtaining paym en t for ProJect REAL work, it is not because he opposes the program in any way whatsoever, but that he cannot determine to whose budget the check is to be charged, and if it has the proper authorization, or CONSENSUS: A "sense of consensus that U'NW is a good idea" emerged from its first New College planning meeting Wednes::lay night. The $40, 000 granted NC to p 1 an and develop" the program here is "seed money", Provost Charles Lyons exP,ained Should New College decide to participtte in the program, more money would prc:b ably follow from donors like the Ford F am dation, the U. S. Office of Education and others. New College is not under obligation even to participate in the program, however. Its implementation here would be under NC's own planning and conditions. This gives NC both much freedom and much difficulty in meetings like Wednes day's. Another variable is its relationships to Union Graduate School which could be non-existent (although many of the schods participating in UWW are also involved in c.AN JICDfm To: President Elmendorf Provost Lyons Humanities Division Board of Trustees Last year a total of twenty successful e valuations in Art History were given du ring the two terms an Art Historian was in residnece, a total far below the aver age per Humanities facult}nember. During term two this year there are only thirty-six sutqetts registered for Art History courses and tutorials, which is not an overload when compared to other in structors' registration figures. Students have already expressed thatArt History was one of their lowest hiring priorities; in the October poll, Art History ranked twentieth, receiving only 1 first place vote. Students' interests are in different areas which are unfilled by faculty such as cultural anthropology. education, photo graphy, filmmaking, communications and media and drama; also there are dis ciplines with so many students as to preclude the psooibility of frequent s m a 11 seminars (such as literature and psychology). THEREFORE; WE ASK1 DEMAND, CAJCl.E PLEAD, IMPLORE, AND REQUIRE: That New College not hire an Art Historian in fulfillment d the two new Hu manities posittions authorized by the Board of Trustees. That the antiquated hiring prioritiesthat caii for the hiring of an Art Historian before any other position be changed. That the students have a direct and ac tive voice in deciding new hiring priori ties for the College. I I If If 6 t the work that was done for which he is p:r ying. There is no general fund that is ch31' ged for ProJect REAL costs or work study costs. Every program is budgeted for a gi ven amount of money and work for that program is debited against its budget. There is no work-study salaried. In the case of Mike Macey, Harra just could not figure out wha;e budget to Clm&f it to. When Marshall Barry signed the wcrk sheet the first time, he signed it "econo mics department" and there is no such tud get, at least for the type of work Mike Macey performed. When this was brought to Barry's attention, he signed it Social Sciences, which needed Dr. Deme1s ap proval. This was, of course, not in Barry's original budget for soc sci work studf and De me did not approve it. At this time it w2.5 decided to charge it to ProJectRFAL so that Mike could get his money. The decision to charge it to Project REAL' s budget was made, as the work was for 'Project REAL; all work study salary is budgeted against the particular budget for which the work is done. There is no general fund for work study out of which funds are taken. Money was NOT ripped off, as work done for Project REAL was paid by ProJect REAL: the government kicked in its share of work study money. VOL II FEBRUARY 19, 1971 NO. 12 TEAR DOWN The government does not pay all the work study funds. Furthermore, there is a limit to the amount of money per student that the government will pay. qualifies a student for work-study but there is no work-study fund as such. The amQJlt that the college pays is counted against tle particular department, program or divisiCll r the student is working, i.e. Soc Sc1, ProJect REAL or library. Last year students on work-study earned $50, 000 and the government paid but $12, 000 of it Every voucher for money must have adequate and proper documentation for review by IRS and CWSP. As far as Project REAL goes, Harra stated that usually the on 1 y justification for accounting of the expend itures is that Barry is Director not quite proper accounting procedure. Dr. Elmendorf himself can't ask for money with an undocumented voucher, The Divison of Social Sciences has to approve all expenditures drafted against its budget; the individual instructors can draft on it if Dr. Deme approves. Barry hired a bunch of people for ProJect RE.i\L but the money wasnever budgeted against Soc Sci at the time the budget was put together, and as a result their wages have been deducted from ProJect REAL's budget since they are wolking for ProJect RFAL THE SllVJ\\ Union) or as overlapping as New College Gorfein also questioned the feasibiJity chose. of lowering costs, which Lyons had exDr. K"nox urged a decision for what plained would be a c com p 1 ish e d by Dr. Gorfein called a "traget date. "With minimizing residnece requirements, a rna a decision made within this academicyea: Jpr expense of higher education. Gorfein the remaining money (which maybe spent cited the example of NC's current ISP's, up to Dec. 1971) could be used in imple-which he called "a farce." mentation. Many of these problems had been re-Presonally favoring the program, Lycognized by Lyons woo recommended 3 ons presented positive and possible oega-general areas of study early in the meet-tive arguments. ing. On the "longer, more convincing"po-The first was originating an sitive list were "influx of a new kind of orientation and guidance system. Impera-people" both students and faculty, making tive to this would be an educational colll a "new enrichment" possible; facilities d selor, someone to help students identify a large number of schools becoming more the programs most useful to the goals trey open than they are now; a vehicle for m:re want to acbEve. Lyons acknowledged too minority group people to Nc; regained n:rthe stages of defining, identifying, and tional publicity; and a number of finaocial bringing in such a person. reasons, including UWW's being "financi-Admissions also presetted a "brand ally feasible." new problem" because !JWW would not Lyons also suggested potential obJec-be dealing almost exclusively with stutions. Amongthese were that the idea as a dents who are 18 and fresh out whole was bad, that it is a good idea but of high school. Again, identification of not our purpose, loss of NC's outside rep.appropriate people was defined as a 'inautation as an "academic pearl", possibiH:y JOr task," losing a large percentage of NC students Lyons also recognized the demand i:>r to the U'NW programs, and serious a "maJor resource center", a coordinat-drain on faculty who are already overwcrk tion of resources, throughout the who 1 e ed. country. UWW principles questioned with res-At Dr. Knox's suggestion, a prelim-pect to their implementation here were inary consideration was added to these! mostly making degrees more accessible the effect of the UWW on New College. and less expensive. Dennis Saver and later Lyons suggesDr. Gorfein repeatedly questioned the ted that the group at the meeting (abOlt validity of exchanging students and other 40), in Dennis's words, "divide to brain associations with colleges in UWW which storm the four areas. he implied were below NC's academic Lyons asked those interested to send standards. him a note with specific areas UWW Others, including Nick Munger, Mrs. might look into (such as a special topi Elmendorf, and Alex Goldstein, empha-for the program's concentration here)anl sized the advantages of broadening the op specfic things they would be interated i1 portunities available at New College. working on. REFLECTIVE LIVING In our c o 11 e c t i v e f a n t a s y New College's Kingsley Hall would be a pla::e where the social and acedemic realms would merge and become as one. We cur rently attend classes, converse in faculty offices, use the library, and look ourse],. ves away in our rooms to study. We call this "work" --what we're here for. We also visit with friends, have parties, and play a variety of games. We call this''s::> cializing" and while it's not "what we're here for" the fact remains that much of our tim e is spent engaged in such activities. That these two parts of our lives are so obviously separated and often an tithetical is a source of anxiety and of disappointment for many of us and a situation we would like to change. To do so involves a shift in attitudes about learning from something which wedosane of the time (in classes etc. ) and which we "get" only from some sources (books professors, etc.) to something which we do all of thie time and which we create in a total enviroment. ---We fee 1 it necessary to collect ourselves together, an organism of "critical friends" not to separate ourselves from the rest of the college, nor to alienate those not fully involved, but rather to maximize the possibility of realizing thi> fantasy. It is conceivable that we w i 1 1 provide an educational model for others to consider, and have thus constituted ourselves and whoever else becomes com mitted to the realization of the ideals put forth above as participants in an "expet' iment". We want to encourage the participation, on some level if not that of total commitment, of everyone iJ. the cd lege. Commitment to the proJect will entail the following, ordered fromthe general to the specific: 1} A recognition of the need for a new pt radigm for the purpose of education (or is it in truth the most ancient?): Towards the realization of the individual as a mole person, towards the actualization of self. 2}A cooperative (as opposed to competitive) appraoch to learning. An attempt to learn from each other, students and il culty, roles blurr all learners, all teachErS. In short, a r aliz::1tion of the ideals of the and of the community of scholars--not academicists, but scholars. l)Espousald the belief that learning for the purpose of realization of self is a lie long process, that the concept of time in crements (three years for a degree, ten weeks for a course, or one month for an Continued on p. 2

PAGE 2

page 2 ZORN'S LEMMA Feb. 19, 1971 page 2 "Sight has not yet produced its c i v i I i z a t i 0 n Caleb Gattegno by David Pini I often remarl< to myself in the bookstore how unfortunate it is that so many of the books which I find so interesting or necessary in my own conversation wth the world remain for so long on the shelves (or, in fact, may not appear there at all). I should like therefore to attempt to ocasionally persuade you of the fasciantion and even necessity of at least some of those worlion and reflection among our group. Basically our position is that we are i or the freedom of individuals to 1 i ve Nllatever kinds of lives they choose and to fulfill their unique potentials for' development. Hom e -oriented concerns like baking bread and taking care of childrel\ as well as activities involving decision making oriented toward the "outside world", engaging in worl
PAGE 3

-o-...M:"" I. Student Bill of Rights A. Students' residences, and other college property which is intended for the personal use and supervision of the individual student shall not be subjected to search or seizure without a proper warrant. A student's private property or person shall not be subjected to search or seizure in any case without the student's specific permis sion. B. No person may be judged guilty of violating a student rule because of any action which occurred before the rule was enacted and made public. c. No person 111ay be prosecuted more than once for the same alleged infraction of a student rule. D. All persons shall be guaranteed freedom of expression, of affiliation, and of assembly, within the extant of the students' constitutional jurisdiction. E. All persons shall have the right to a public and speedy hearing on alleged viola tions of student rules. All persons shall have the right to confront their accusers, to call witnesses, to adduce evidence, and to their case, with the help of counsel if desired. F. No person may be required to bear witness against himself. G. All persons shall be considered innocent of any alleged infraction until proven guilty. H. The en11meration of these rights does not p:::'aclllde the legitimacy of others, IL Student Executive Committee A. Membership: .There shall be eleven members of the SEC. 1. Three reg11lar members shall be elected from each of the following groups (henceforth to be called classes): a. St11dents in their first, second, and third terms of attendance. b. Students in their fourth, fifth, and sixth terms of atttendance. c. St11dents after their sixth term of attendance. 2. The chairman, a st11dent, shall be elcted at large by the students, 3. The Director of Student Policy will be a member of the SEC. 4. There shall also be three alternate members of the SEC, one from each class to serve only when required to make a q11orum. In seating alternates precedence shall be given to the alternate from the class with the most absent membel'l. In case two classes have the same number absent, precedence shall be given to the senior class. The smallest number of alternates nece ssary to make a q11orum shall be seated in allcases. s. Proxies will be alloweq only during Independent St11dy Pe. ri_ods.. If written a11thonzation from the regular SEC member has been presented to the SEC chairman, the proxy will be seated at all SEC meetings dllring the Independent Study Period and will be allowed to vote. The proxy must be from the same class as the reglllar SEC member he is representing. B. Election proced11res 1. SEC regular members a. Nominations i. Nominations shall open one week after the beginning of each term and close one week later. ii. To place a name on the ballot a petition must be signed by 1596 of the nominee1s class. b. Elections i. The election should follow at most within two days of the close of nominations. ii. The Election will be by secret ballot in a centrally convenient location. iii. To elect his representatives each student may cast two votes. iv. The election shall determine by plurality which three students will represent each class on the SEC. That person from each class with the fourth highest number of votes shall be designated as alternate to the SEC from that class. Ties shall be broken in a run-off election. v. The SEC member from each class with the highest n11mber of votes shall be designated that class representative to the College CounciL In case that person cannot attend any College Council meeting, the SEC member from that class with the next highest number of votes shall replace him on the College Co11ncil. 2. Chairman a. Nominations i. Nominations shall open one week after the beginning of the second term, and clCllle one week later. ii. To place a name on the ballot a petition must be signed by five per cent of the students. b. Elections C. Officers i. The election should follow at most within two days of the close of nom_ inat10DS ii. The election shall be by secret ballot in a convenient central location. iii. To elect the chairman of the SEC each stlldent may cast one vote. iv. The election shall determine by maJority of those voting which st11dent shall serve as chairman of the SEC. If on the first ballot no one candidate receives a maJOrity of the votes, a run-off election shall be held the next day between the fewest candidates (including ties, in order from the one with the most votes) whose total combined vote comprises at least of the votes cast. v. Write-in ballots will be allowed except in run-off elections. vi. Absentee ballotting will be allowed in elections for chairman, details to be worl
PAGE 4

page 4 come to the constitutional convention page 4 classes suspended Monday page 4 come to the constituitional convention page 4 classes suspended Monday page 4 4. No member of the SEC will be a member of the Court. b) No unnecessary damage to the residence or belongings and no wmecessary &. Election Procedure inconvenience to the }persons involved must result from such entry or earch. l. c) At no time within the JUrisdictipn of the SEC may a student or his personal Nommat10ns d belongings be searched without his permission. i. Nominations shall open one week after the begmnmg of the fust and secon 3) Only evidence obtained with a proper warrant correctly served, shall be ad-terms and close one wek later. missable in SC proceedngs ii To place a name on the ballot a petition must be signed by 5 of the student t d ii. If there is reason to believe that persons or property are m 1mmmen anger or body In attendance. ch d" t t" th de e may be en.. Students in their first term of attendance may not run for the position of S C that any su emergency exiSts requuing Imme Ia e ac 10n en a res1 Ill. tered without a warrant; no evidence of violations of student rules so obtained lS admlsJUdge. bl SC eli b El t" sa e m procee ngs. i. should follow at most within two days of the close of nominations. b. Preliminaty I-:Iearings: a violation is to the Student Court, the court Th le t"on shall be by secret ballot in a centrally convenient location. shall hold a prehmmary heanng. A copy of the complaint shall be sent to the iii.11To :l:ct each student may cast four votes. as the complaint is filed, T_he accused be notified of of which _ise IS Th 1 ct" hall determine by plurality which ni>minees are judges. Ties accused at least 48 hours prior to the heanng. The accused has the nght to a heanng ll ;vb k: by a run-off election. ithin 10 days after the alleged infraction, unless it might preJudice a cas_e lD WI e .; ballots will be allowed except in run-off elections. civil or criminal courts. In this situation the heamg may be delayed unt1l the case IS 2 n e f the judges will be elected chairman by the court. closed. If the SC fails to provide the hearing, the case is dismissed. The accused may C Off" airman: e 0 waive his right to a days hearing. The student prosecutor shall present the i. be a chairman, as described above, wlx>se term of office shall be one charges. The accused m.ust be informed of the provisions of the SC Constitutional Modes college term or two college terms depending upon when he is elected. of Procedure and the Student Bill of Rights. If the accused pleadsgui lty the StudentCourt 2 There shall be a secretary by the Court whose termd office shall also be shall deal with the violation in accordance with the established judicial procedures/ one college term. i. If the accused pleads guilty, the Student Court shall deallwith the violation in D. Hearings accordance with the established judicial procedures. 1. Hearings shall be held at least once a week at a regularly scheduled time and ii. If the accused pleads not guilty the SC shall determine whether or not there are place. sufficient grounds for a trial. __ 2. Special hearings may be called by any thre eSC Judges. A reasonable e f fort 1) if it is determined that there are sufficient grounds, the accused shall be boum must be made to contact all JUdges individually. over for trial. E. Functions 2) If it is determined that thereare not sufficient grounds, the accused shall be 1. The SC shall handle all matters of student discipline subJeCt to SEC action as spe-dismissed. cified in section II E 3. The chairman shall attend all regular meetings of the SEC. c. Trials: The SC must recognize as counsel for the defendent any person appointed 2. Constitutionality by the defendant. (Appointment must be in writing to the chairman of the SC) a. Initiation i. Judge trials: The accused may request and shall receive a judge trial in which i. Upon the receipt of a public petitiion with the signatures of 1/3 of the me nile case after the trial a verdict of guilty requires at least four concurring votes of the mem-of the SEC or of the studems in attendance questioning the constitutionality of a bers of the SC. If the accused requests a JUdge trial, it shall be he1ld when a quorum of particular act or particular acts of the SEC other than adecision made by the SEC in the SC can be present to hold it. Four of the five members of the SC shall constitute a its JUdicial function as specified in sec. II E 3 which conforms to the form in section quorum for JUdge trials. ii below, the SC shall begin constitutional review procedures. ii. Jury teials: The accused may also request and shall receive a jury trial. A ii. The petition must explicitly state what particular act or acts of the SEC as venire of ten students shall be chosen by lot from among all the eligible students (this recorded in the SEC minutes are being called into question, what particular section or excludes all members of the SC, the SEC, the prosecutor(s), the defendant(s), tt. coun-sections of the Student Constituion the petitioners believe said act or acts of the SEC sel(s) for the defense, and any witness(es)), and the jury will pe seated from this venire violate, and why they believe said act or acts to be in violation of the cited section subject to the objections of either counsel. The prospective JUrors shall be considered in or sections 6 f the Student Constitution. the order of their selection in the lottery, and if an obJection to the seating of any pro-b. Procedures spective juror is sustained by the presiding JUdge, that prospective JUror shall be excused i. Both the petitoners and the members of the SEC or its subcommittees sul?port:i:g and the next one considered, and so on until a full jury of six has been seated. (If a the act or acts have theright to defend thi'er positions before the court in a public hear full jury cannot be seated due to a large number of objections sustained, adiiitional ve-ing. Either party may waive this right without nullifying the right of the other party nires shall be selected by lot and the process of considering prospective JUrors shall con-or both parties may waive this right. Waivers must be submitted to the court in writ-tinue until six. students have been seated). In a jury trial, the accused shall be consider-ing. ed innocent unless judged guilty by at least four members of the jury. If the accused is ii. After the public hearing, or without it if it is waived by both parties, the SC judged guilty, proper sentence shall be imposed by a majority of the entire court, i.e., shall deliberate publicly deliver their decision. by at least three assenting votes. c. The decision of the court. d. Expulsion: Any recommendation for expulsion must be approved by a two-thirds i. The decision of the court shall be that decision agreed upon by four of the vote of the SEC before it is sent to the College Council or Director of Student Po 1 icy J Udges. The remaining judges may give dissenting opinions. If no agreement can be for implementation. reached among four of the Judges, the entire act or acts of the SEC shall be assumed e. SEC notification: The chairman and secretary of the SEC shall receive written noconstitutional. of all recommend-ations made by the Student Court and of all disciplinary action ii. Both decision of the court and dissenting opinions must explicitly state what par by the Director of Student Policy. They shall also receive ticular act or acts of the SEC as recorded in the SEC minutes are being rejected as unlesser action taken by the Student Court itself whether in preliminary hear-constitutional, what section or sections of the Student C nstitution are held to be in mgs or m tnals. conflict with or to support the sal d act or acts of the SEC and why the judge r judges 2. Formal and Informal Modes of Procedure believe said act or acts to be in violation or upheld by the cited section or sections of a. The SC may enact its own formal or informal Modes of Procedure. the Student Constitution. b _The SEC may review any provision of the formal or informal Modes of the SC. Upiii. Judges may declare parts of the particular act or acts cited in t:B e initiating on review SEC may request by a two-thirds vote that a provision of the formal or in-petition for review as constitutional and parts unconstitutional, however, no act other formal Modes of the SC be deleted which request is bindinp: on the SC. than the particular act or acts cited inthe initiation petition for review may be declared c. The SEC may enact or alter any provision of the formal or informal SC modes by constitutional or unconstitutional. The form in declaring such a divided decision shall l a two-thirds vote, which enactments or alterations are binding on the SC. be the same as specified in section ii above. d. The SC may request and receive a reconsideration of an SEC decision concerning iv. The effect of declaration of unconstitutionality for a particular act or partie-the formal or informal SC Modes, in order to present formal obJections to the decision. alar acts or a portion or portions thereof is that they are null and void, and the No formal objections of the SC are binding on the SEC. SEC is advised not to enact similar motions since they would hkely be declared unconIV. Amendment sttitutional .also if brought before the SC. The effect of a declaration of III E 2 c iv A. Proposals to amend the Student Constitution may be initiated in two ways: constitutionality or in case no fow judges can come to agreement is that the act or acts 1. A majority recommendation of the SEC may initiate a proposal for amendment. or portion or portions thereof remain in effect. Any acts or act being reviewed by the 2. A petition of none-third of the students in attendance may initiate a proposal for SC remain in effect until they are declared unconstitutional. amendment. F. Recall: Same procedure as for recall of the SEC chairman as speci.tied in Section B. After the initiation of such a change the committee shall prepare a secret b a 11 ot II G. publicized at least a week in advance and held promptly after the week of publicity. A G. Vacancies: procedures as for SEC members as specified in section II H. favorable vote of two-thirds of those voting, provided over one-half of the students in H. Procedures attendance vote, or a favorable vote of half the students in attendance, 1. Constitutional Modes of Procedure attendance vote, or a maJority of the students in attendance, whichever is smaller, shall a. Entry and search: No member of the SEC or SC or any of their wbcommittees pass the ammendment. in the fulfillment of his duties as a member of those bodies shall enter a student resi-C. A proposal to amend the constitution of the College Council shall be publicized im-dence without the permission of an accupant of that residnece nor search the residnece mediately after receipt by the Supervisory Committee and should be voted on after at or college property therein of any student, without the permission of him, except un-least a week of publicity and at most within ten days. A two-thirds maJority of th ose der the following conditions: voting, proviaed -over one-half of the students in attendance vote, or a favorahle vote of i. If a proper warrant for such entry or serach has been obtained from the SC half the students in attendence, whichever is smaller, shall constitute approval by the as specified in its modes of procedwe, in advance of the entry or search and said waP. students. rant is correctly served. Amendment: l)Only warrants meeting all the fllowing criteria will be considered proper waP. I. Student Chair (passed Aprill4, 1970) a) A warrant musf specify the residence to be entered or the residence or college property to be serached. b)A warrant must specify the time period in which the warrant is valid c) A warrant mliSt pecify the person (s) authorized to use the warrant d)A warrant must specify the puxpose for which the warrant was issued. If that puxpose involves t]:le search forevidence of violation of st udent rules, or the possible confiscation of such evidence or any obJect thus found, it' must be so stated on the war rant and such warrants may only be issued if there is good reason to believe that such a violl.tion has occurred or will occur and that such evidence or obJects are to be fotnd in the place designated for search. A warrant may be used only for the puxpose stated therex>n any evidence obtained other than for the specified purpose will not be ad missible .in SC proceedings. 2)0nly warrants served in the following manner will be considered correctly served: a)The persons using the arrant must knock before entering a residence and show the warrant upon demand BOOK XCH AI\ GE 3913 Brown Ave. STARKER'S with love ST. ARMAND'S ORCU: IF WE DON'T DIG IT, we can go to Tampa. WILLIAMS STATIONERY co. "COMPLETE OFFICE OUTFITTERS" 1419 Street 958-6003 For y_, Pll.atapapbic Suppli See CAMERA CENTElt .. Pllototr ... ic Sanlota *'SiliCa Drive f5S-l537 lcleaa 4524 14da SU.et A. Each term at least five dollars of each student's Act1v1ty Fee shall be placed _m a special Student Chair Fund. The holder of_ the Student Chair shall be a person of lnstructional function to be sponsored wholly, or 1n part, by the student body. B. M;ney from the Student Chair Fund may not be used for purpose_s other than t h e hiring of a Student Chair candidate without the approval of a two-th1rds vote of the dents, provided a maJority of the students in residence vote, or by an absolute maJonty of the students in residence, whichever is least. C. The SEC may designate the use of the Student Chair Fund of future terms for up to one year. b D. Nominations for the Student Chair shall be made by the S EC, fmal selection to e by a maJOrity of those students voting in a referendum held after one week of publicity according to the usual procedures. ZJ,l & 9. DIPPER DA!f I SaO MAifll .,.RIIIrT Ia ""ON& eae.ea77 cas a ---(1., f; Trail Plaza 3333 N. Tamiami Trail Phone 355-3931 e ncan tad a lMPORTS FROM MEXICO 19 N. Boulevard of Presidents St. Armand's idols and from the mrxicain s1lver and gold pierced ear nngs .. straw and raffia banded hats .. and, JUSt .rTived!: cotton bdts, all colon